Richard III

Now is the winter of our discontent

Made glorious summer by this son of York;

And all the clouds that loured upon our house

In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.

Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths,

Our stern alarums changed to merry meetings,

Our dreadful marches to delightful measures.

Grim-visaged war hath smoothed his wrinkled front,

He capers nimbly in a lady’s chamber

To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.

But I, that am not shaped for sportive tricks

Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;

Why, I in this weak piping time of peace

Have no delight to pass away the time,

Unless to spy my shadow in the sun

And descant on mine own deformity.

And therefore since I cannot prove a lover

To entertain these fair well-spoken days,

I am determined to prove a villain

And hate the idle pleasures of these days.

(Act 1, scene 1)

This passage, being the first lines of the novel, sets up what is to come. Here the reader sees Richard's plans to conquer the throne by any means he sees fit. A first look at Richard's selfishness is seen here along with his evilness. He need for power is also apparent here along with the reader being told about his deformity. He uses his deformity as an excuse as to why he has no need to be peaceful being that he can never have a lover. Instead of giving sympathy to Richard, it makes him seem more monstrous, because he can so happily toss aside all of the things that the rest of society cherishes such as the peacefulness. At the same time, Richard’s speech makes his true motivations seem all the more mysterious and dark. Thinking back on the play, throughout me reading it, I do not ever remember thinking about Richard's deformity. I completely forgot about it until I chose my passage for the blog. I find it odd that typically a deformity takes away some evil aspect of a person and gives them a little bit of sympathetic light. In the play however, Richard is so extremely evil, that not once did I ever give him and sympathy nor did I ever think of his deformity. It really did truly make him a more ugly person both on the inside and the outside being that he used his deformity as an excuse to be evil and not care about other people.

While reading the play, I never thought of it as a history but rather as a story. Which is good for Shakespeare and shows his great writing talents being that I learned something and did not even realize it. I also give props to Shakespeare being that he made a commentary on the time period in which he lived in. Back in the day, what Richard did was a common thing. Power was what mostly all people wanted. In the end, Shakespeare used histories as a comment on his society; especially the political aspect of society. His histories are also very blunt unlike the comedies. The hero's are clearly hero's while the villain's are the epitome of villain's. He leaves the reader at the end of the novel with a moral story of history being able to repeat itself if one becomes blind to certain things. This blindness is exactly what the character in the play were. They knew how evil Richard was, however whenever they gave him the chance to talk they forgot all about it.

I did not enjoy this play as much as the others. This is only because it is more of a visual play then one you should read. It was hard to grasp everything that was going on without seeing it visually on a stage. An example of this was when you (Mr. Klimas) had me stage the scene where all the people Richard killed came back and haunted him. It was easier to grasp the overwhelmingness of the whole scene versus reading it on paper and making up your own image in your head. History is also not exactly my favorite genre. Comedy and tragedy, I find to me more enjoyable reads.

Macbeth

"Out, damned spot; out, I say. One, two,—why, then ’tis time to do’t. Hell is murky. Fie, my lord, fie, a soldier and afeard? What need we fear who knows it when none can call our power to account? Yet who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him?" (Act IV, scene 1)

This scene is spoken by Lady Macbeth after the murder of Duncan. Earlier in the play Macbeth, her husband, believed that his hands were permanently blood stained. She rebutted this by saying that water will clean it off. Now, in the scene, she too sees blood on her hands and goes into madness from the guilt. It was also earlier where her inability to sleep was foreshadowed by the voice her husband heard while killing Duncan. Lady Macbeth's delusion of blood on her hands further the use of blood within the novel as a symbol of guilt. Her words are completely hollow at this point. Blood represents a permanent stain that symbolizes the guilt with both Lady Macbeth and Macbeth's conscious that will be with them till death.

This is your typical, perfectly labeled, tragic story. Both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth die. They both greatly suffer before their death from the guilt. They both are different people when in front of someone versus just talking among themselves. And they are both not truly happy. All of these components are what make up the label for the novel to be tragic. It is very hard for the reader to miss all the tragedy being that Shakespeare writes it on the pages. Unlike his comedy, which is underlying, tragedy forces the reader to stop and think about what is being said.

Even though I find Shakespeare's comedies more enjoyable, the novel of Macbeth was not a bad one. I had read it in fifth grade, along with seeing parts of the movie. It was nice to see what I failed to understand as a fifth grader to come to life as a senior in high school. An example of this for me was the "out spot" scene. That one always baffled me when I was younger. I just couldn't grasp the concept of why this woman was yelling at her hands for a spot to come out that wasn't even there. I never really put thought into any of this again until this year when we read the play. And now with a complete understanding in the play and its symbolism's, I can enjoy it more than I did back in the day.

The Taming of the Shrew

Petruccio: Come, come, you wasp, i’faith you are too angry.

Katherine: If I be waspish, best beware my sting.

Petruccio: My remedy is then to pluck it out.

Katherine: Ay, if the fool could find where it lies.

Petruccio: Who knows not where a wasp does wear his sting? In his tail.

Katherine: In his tongue.

Petruccio: Whose tongue?

Katherine: Yours, if you talk of tales, and so farewell.

Petruccio: What, with my tongue in your tail?

This passage, from the novel The Taming of the Shrew by Skakespeare, is a conversation between Petruccio and Kate when they meet each other for the very first time. Petruccio, knowing of Kate's shrewness, sets out using his verbal wit to undermine Kate. Petruccio has heard of the stories of Kate and how the other characters compare her to a wild animal. In this passage, he refers to her as a wasp. Kate having a fast tongue attempts to put him back in his place with her smart remarks such as "if i be waspish, you best beware of my sting." He then continues throwing back sexual comments to whatever Kate says. He even mentions his intent to tame her. This whole passage, filled with its sexual innuendos and references embodies the conflict between Kate and Petruccio along with the underlying sexual attraction. This passage also contributes to the motif, domestication. Domestication in the novel, begins with the title (the taming of the shrew). Petruccio's ultimate goal to "tame" Kate also adds to the motif.



Shakespeare's use of comedy as his genre for his novel is not the type of comedy are society is used to. When our class went around in a circle and stated what each person found comedic, there was a wide variety of things. Some people found simple things comedic while others found outrageous things funny. Our society also finds humor in when it's obvious. Shakespeare liked to make the humor less obvious but rather leave it up to the reader (or in the play's case, the watcher) to find the comedy. Shakespeare keeps things somewhat clean (however this statement is contradicted my passage I chose above) and very witty. He utilized sarcasm and simply irony. Comedy is seen in The Taming of the Shrew through the character's use of verbal wit and ridiculous circumstances they get themselves into. In Midsummer Night's Dream, the story line was less realistic and more fantasy. The humor came out of the picture created along with the character's that Shakespeare developes such as Bottom. While today's humor can be offensive to some and not always be funny, Shakespeare's use of humor was good natured and simply to make his audience laugh while working their minds. In the end, I enjoyed this play. However, if I had to choose between this and Midsummer, I would probably choose Midsummer. That one had more apparent comedy and was easier to visualize without actually seeing the play. And I did actually get a chance to see an excerpt of it performed and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

The Victims by Sharon Olds

In this poem, the main message is a commentary on our society where divorce is prevalent and how difficult it is for the people affected by the divorce to deal with it. In the beginning of the poem, the speaker appears to be a young child telling his/her experience with the divorce. The speaker is angry towards the father, "when mother divorced you, we were glad" (1). The "we" represents the family members who endured the same hardships the speaker did. The line "she took it and/ took it, in silence, all those years" (1-2) references to an act of abuse whether it be physical or verbal or even total silence. The poem later comments on the father's job which leaves the reader to believe that the father was possibly a workaholic and was never home to spend time with his family. The family is so bitter towards the father that when he was fired, "we grinned inside" (4-5). When the father was fired, Olds uses a simile to Nixon. Nixon, the father of the country at the time, and the father of the poem, both head of a nation and head of a household both had to leave due to the failure of fulfilling their duties. Another aspect that contributed to the father being a workaholic is the mention of his suits in line 11. The speaker only remembers her father's identity as being tied into the suits. It also means that it would be end to the years of silence. The mother of the family is basically out to destroy the father's image. She turns the children against him, "She had taught us to take it, to hate you and take it until we pricked with her for your annihilation" (15-17). There is also a shift from past tense to present tense in the poem. In the present tense the speaker compares her father to the bums on the street as the bums are nothing and no one cares for them. The bums are also a metaphor that the father lost "everything". The line "ships gone down" (22) also is a reference to the father. The poem begins with the speaker giving off the sense that he/she is extremely hurt by the father's actions or lack of. The poem however takes a twist and ends with the speaker wondering who really was the victim. I felt sympathy towards the father by the end of the poem, because his life is completely ruined. The bums, I believe are what instilled that feeling of sympathy towards him in me. I myself believe in second chance and I feel that here in this situation he deserves one. I also feel sympathy towards the children or are being raised by the mother. The mother is acting childish in this situation and brainwashing the children into hating their father.
I chose this poem, through the process of once again flipping to a random page and choosing from the poems presented to me on that page. Adieu, Farewell, Earth's Bliss was ruled out for it was too long. What gramma said about her grandpa was a cute poem but not very fun to analyze. That left me with The Victims. I actually liked this poem and how well it related to society today. In a divorce, everyone is a victim. It also comments how the divorce affects everyone for the rest of their lives. I liked how Old's, through her writing, got the reader to feel sympathetic not only towards the speaker but also towards the father whom the mother tries so hard to destroy his image.

To an Athlete Dying Young by A. E. Housman

The speaker of this poem is a resident of the town in which the athlete resided. The message of the story is that the only way a person can capture glory and make it last is to die young. It has an even greater affect on people if the person achieves greatness before they die young. This allows the person to live forever in the minds of the people remembering him. They remember him at his highest level of standing. He also receives more sympathy over the fact that he died when he was young and never got to experience everything in life. Housman suggests to the reader that the later years of life are boring and wearisome. In the line "Smart lad, to slip betimes away/ From fields where glory does not stay" (9-10) he praises the young athlete for dying before his glory faded. Eternal life in people's minds seems to be given to those that die at a relatively young age. Housman uses rhyme in his poem to make the poem more likeable to the reader. Many of the lines in the poem appear to be in some form of iambic pentameter as well. This is seen in the first stanza. Alliteration is seen in line one "the time you won your town the race", "road all runners" (5), "townsman of a stiller town" (8), "silence sounds" (15), "runners whom renown outran" (19), and "fleet foot" (22). "Silence sounds" is also an oxymoron. Finally, synecdoche is seen in the line "Fleet foot on the sill of shade" where the foot represents the entire body.
In the process of choosing a poem to write about, I decided to just flip to a page. This round of flipping, I had the choice of either To an Athlete Dying Young or Bredon Hill also by A. E. Housman. I chose the athlete one because I liked the rhyming pattern better then the other poem's. It was more pleasing to the ear along with being more pleasing to the eye. I also like how the poem's message pointed out a true statement about society. It is genuinely true that people who die young receive more praise and attention after their death then those who die old.

On Reading Poems to a Senior Class at South High by D. C. Berry

With this poem, the readers discovers so much before the poem itself it is even read just by simply knowing the title. The title here sets a foundation to what the reader should expect when reading the poem. One knows that the speaker is an outsider who coming to speak to the senior class and has no connection with the school. The reader also knows that the speaker is well-known for his speaking and very practiced in what he does based off the fact that he/she was invited to come. One also gets the sense that the speaker is not looking forward to speaking to the Senior class and feels that he/she is too mature for them. All of this is confirmed in the first stanza. He starts off with the line "Before/ I opened my mouth" (1-2) where he seems to have prepared himself for the stereotypical bored and indifferent faces of the seniors. He also refers to them as "frozen fish" highlighting the students unhappiness of being there. The third stanza of the poem, which is also the largest stanza hides the primary irony of the poem. In the line "and then I heard the sounds/ of fish in an aquarium" (10-11) it appears that the speaker is attempting to eliminate the students which comments on the fact that he is insecure reading in front of them. He feels that by having anything to do with the class, he feels he will be held back. He attempts to find delight in the poems he is reading to ignore this "tried to drown them with my words" (13-14). Unexpectedly however, the class "opened up" to what he was saying. The students simply want to be at the same place he is at while reading the poem. But because of the speaker's attitude towards them he does not see it that way. He feels that they are only doing this out of force, not because they want to. A transition occurs within the poem in stanza four, where the speaker and the students unite into a "we". They go through the experience of the poems together. Alliteration is seen here with the words "thirty tails" and "whacking words". The speaker shed his views of the students and because of this, he ventures into their world. He learned something in the art in which he supposedly mastered from people who he originally thought were ignorant. Even after the bell rang, and the students returned to their classes, he was left in awe and continued to be affected by the experience. This poem began with a terribly pessimistic outlook that ironically evolved into something completely unexpected.
I chose this poem because I liked the change in attitudes the author incorporated into it. The poem basically started out with a very experienced speaker called to read poems to his notion of ignorant high school students turns into a lesson where he learns that there is still room for him to learn things and this knowledge comes in many forms. I also liked how he used the title to set the foundation of the poem. His creative usage of other things, such as the fish reference instead of the students, also impressed me.

A Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man

A theme that was apparent within the novel was the theme of flight. I discovered through some research on this novel that Stephen Dedalus's very name involves the idea of flight. A figure from Greek Mythology was named Daedalus. Daedalus was known for the designing of the Labyrinth of Crete for King Minos. Daedalus was imprisoned along with his son Icarus by Minos, however Daedalus created wings out of feathers, twine, and wax for means of escape. Daedalus escapes successfully, but his son dies from flying too close to the sun. In the novel, Stephen can be seen in both Daedulus and Icarus. Throughout the novel, the theme of balance is also apparent. Stephen learns that he must balance his desire to escape Ireland's political and religious restrictions while staying true to himself. He endures many ups and downs trying to find this balance. He starts out at following his family's opinion of religion and politics. He then goes to one extreme where he commits sin knowing that it is against the church. He soon follows with the other extreme of pure dedication to the church. He soon sees that both ways of living are unhealthy. After spending sometime at the University he realizes that it is his time to leave and go into exile to develop his ideas of being an artist. The birds that appear to Stephen in the third section of Chapter five signal that it is finally time for him, now a fully developed artist, to take flight himself.



I actually enjoyed this novel in the beginning. However as the novel progressed and the words continued to get more and more wordier, that enjoyment slowly disappeared. I liked the beginning because I enjoy reading stream of consciousness type writing when it is in simple terms. An example of this is Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. It is a whole lot easier to just let go and read the novel. Once the words lose their simpleness, which in this case was as he matured and discovered listening to his individual thoughts, it really just became a different, complicated novel. When reading, it took me forever to get past one page because I would have to keep re reading and re reading everything to understand what Stephen was saying. I also did not like the mature, grown up Stephen's character. He was seemed to be thinking only about himself and appeared to be a little obnoxious with his opinions on religion and Ireland as a whole. All in all I would rate this book a six. The beginning was great; the end and the character of Stephen Deadalus, not so much.

"26 April: I go to encounter for the millionth time the reality of experience and to forge in the smithy of my soul the uncreated conscience of my race.
27 April: Old father, old artificer, stand me now and ever in good stead"

The quote above if from the very end of the novel where Stephen decides to become an artist for the rest of his life. He strives to be an artist whose individual consciousness will be the foundation of all of his work. He wants to create a voice for his community. Stephen's mission is reinforced by the words "old father" and which represents Ireland's past. His role in art is emphasized with the words "old artificer". Stephen hopes that through his art, he will be able to benefit himself along with his community whom is now getting a voice. I chose this quote because I really liked the language James Joyce incorporated. There are so many other words he could have used to write this, but they would not sound as "nice" or flow as smoothly as the words he chose here. I also liked the vast contrast between this page versus the first page of the novel. It made me laugh to think about how the novel started off with "moo cows" and bed wetting and then ended with such deep thoughts.

Siren Song by Margaret Atwood

The poem Siren Song by Margaret Atwood is a poem about beautiful woman who sing a beautiful song that entices men to come save them which ultimately leads to their death from crashing their boats into the jagged, rough rock around the island where they end up drowning to death. The poem starts out with the lines "This is the one song everyone/ would like to learn: the song/ that is irresistible" (1-3). This comments on society of how a lot of woman desire to be beautiful and use their beauty to attract men. Every female at some point in their life dreams of being rescued by a cute male or even to have power over that male. In the beginning of the poem, the reader gets the sense that it is someone who has witnessed the acts of the sirens and the male rescuers is speaking. However it ends up that the speaker of the poem is a Siren herself. This shift is seen in line ten of the poem. She tells the tale of her life as a Siren and appears to be bored with what she does. The story she tells in the poem leaves the reader at the end feeling sympathetic towards the life of a siren. The poem is like the siren's song itself. It entices the reader to give the siren sympathy. However when one sits back and thinks about this (like I just did myself) one sees that really, the siren does not deserve any sympathy. Day after day she leads men on with her song, which always ends up leading to their death. It has been proven through history that it is man's nature to save a woman in trouble and by the man doing so he typically suffers for it. Atwood comments on the stereotypes that women are helpless, weak, and passive. And yet, at the same time dangerous when it comes to men and trapping them into commitment. But Atwood writes the poem from the women's point of view and that in reality it is the men that are the cause of their own death for always wanting to be the hero and save the woman. The siren's in this song also give off the aura of being somewhat fake. "The bird suit" makes me think of a mascot costume, where the person wearing it has to be something that they are not. The siren's are trapped in this suit of beauty where after being bored and tired of the power they have over men, they want to escape. It is a lose-lose situation for both parties. The poem also leaves the reader questioning the lines "...This song/ is a cry for help: Help me!" (20-21). Does the siren want to be rescued from her fate of being trapped as the person she is or is it a trick, where like the men, she is just leading the reader on? Atwood uses more of a psychological approach to get the attention of the reader instead of a lot of literary devices. In the poem, there is a lot of repetition of the words "the song" where it is seen in almost every stanza.
I have always enjoyed reading Margaret Atwood's novels. Like the novels, I also thouroughly enjoyed reading this poem. I love the way she creatively writes her things. She does it differently then other authors and has her own unique style. I also liked the message of this poem because it could be looked at from two different perspectives. Sorry if my thoughts are all over the place in this one. I just kept thinking of new things to say and found it very difficult to organize all of it.

Heart of Darkness

One huge blatant theme within the novel was the theme of darkness. It was clearly an evil novel. It starts on the surface with the story taking place in Africa in the Congo which is better known as the heart of darkness. But when reading the story between the lines, one sees that the darkness is within everyone. A great example of this inner conflict is the scene involving the head on the stakes. Kurtz specifically places all of the head facing out except for one that faces in towards the hut in which he lives in. This demonstrates Kurtz coming face to face with darkness. All of this darkness is what ultimately leads to Kurtz's death. The darkness consumes the men within the jungle and the only way of escaping it is by walking away from it.

“The brown current ran swiftly out of the heart of darkness, bearing us down towards the sea with twice the speed of our upward progress; and Kurtz’s life was running swiftly, too, ebbing, ebbing out of his heart into the sea of inexorable time. . . . I saw the time approaching when I would be left alone of the party of ‘unsound method"

This quote is from when the steamer is on its way back from the inner station in part III. On board is Kurtz and his ivory on their way down the river or the 'heart of darkness.' The 'brown current' is reffering to the black community. However in this scene the river is ultimatly bringing Marlow back to white civilization. The whole first sentence of this quote seems to be suggesting that Kurtz and Marlow have been able to leave behind the 'heart of darkness', but it appears that it is too late for Kurtz who has already been consumed by the darkness. Marlow is also left scarred by the darkness that surrounded him on his journey. In the end, this quote is symbolic of the darkness that lies within everyone.

Out of all the novels that we have read so far this year, Heart of Darkness was definitely my least favorite. First off the book, while being short, took forever to read. This might be due to the fact that I found its wording to be very dense along with it being immensely boring. Second off, I do not like dark novels such as this. I feel that Conrad could have made the same point without all of the darkness used. Simply, this novel was terrible. I did not find it the least bit interesting to read nor did I feel the writing was good.

Invisible Man

The novel Invisible Man was such a dense book that it is hard to choose one thing to write about. One thing that was one of the biggest themes was the search for identity. The narrator constantly faces on a daily basis the problem of society attempting to mold him into something that he was clearly not. All of this tore the narrator in deciding what side to choose. An example of the narrator's ultimate struggle for identity is seen in one scene where the narrator is living with Mary Rambo. He wakes up one morning preparing to leave for his new life within the Brotherhood. As the narrator is leaving, his eyes fall upon the statue. This statue, which has been there the whole time he is living with Mary, basically sat invisibly in the corner of the room. Trying to ignore the statue, he continues on his way, but he stops when he gets angry at it. He claims the statue is mocking him. Enraged, he breaks the statue which symobolizes the inner conflict of heritage vs. giving it up for the Brotherhood. He also finds the statue offensive at how it portrays blacks with it being a coin bank (pg 319). The bank represents a greedy, obedient slave which again shows his internal struggle. When the narrator finally leaves Mary's house, he brings the statue with him so she would not get upset over its broken fragments. However, as he makes several attempts to abandon it, the statue always ends up back in his hands. This represents the guilt that he faces with leaving his hertiage behind and joining the Brotherhood. It is not until the end of the novel where the narrator's search for identity is complete.



After reading Heart of Darkness, I thouroghly enjoyed this novel. It had so much in it that can be interperted and discussed. I am very impressed with the way Ralph Ellison utilized every page to the best of his ability. Every time I turned a page I discovered something new. This kept me interested which is always good. In the end I would rate it an eight. The only thing I did not like about it was the fact that it was incredibly long. But like I said earlier, not a single page went to waste.

"Our white is so white you can paint a chunka coal and you’d have to crack it open with a sledge hammer to prove it wasn’t white clear through.”

This quote is from the liberty paints scene which I have to say was one of my favorite scenes from the book. The author did such a great job with all of the black and white references within it. The plant is basically a representation of the racial dynamics within society. This is seen between the interactions of the workers along with the paint as well. The main property of the Optic White paint is its ability to cover up blackness. This is a symbol of white power in the narrators society, like the white paint, trying to assimilate and change and hide the black identity.

One day while procrastinating reading that nights worth of homework for this novel, my dad saw the book on my kitchen table. He asked me what the book was about, and I gave him a brief summary. He then went on to tell me that it sounded like the song "The Invisible Man" by Queen. Now while thinking typing this thing up, my mind raced back to this conversation with my father. I pursued looking up the lyrics to the song and found many similarities and thought I should share the lyrics:

I'm the invisible man

I'm the invisible man

Incredible how you can see right through me

When you hear a sound that you just can't place

Feel somethin' move that you just can't trace

When something sits on the end of your bed

Don't turn around when you hear me tread

I'm the invisible man

I'm the invisible man

Incredible how you can see right through me

I'm the invisible man

I'm the invisible man

It's criminal how I can see right through you

Now I'm in your room and I'm in your bed

And I'm in your life and I'm in your head

Like the CIA or the FBI

You'll never get close never take me alive

I'm the invisible man

I'm the invisible man

Incredible how you can see right through me

I'm the invisible man

I'm the invisible man

It's criminal how I can see right through you

Hah hah hah hello

Who goes there?

Hah hah hah OK

Who goes there?

Hah hah hah hello hello hello hello

Never had a real good friend - not a boy or a girl

No-one knows what I've been through - let my flag unfurl

So I make my mark from the edge of the world

From the edge of the world

From the edge of the world

Now I'm on your track and I'm in your mind

And I'm on your back but don't look behind

I'm your meanest thought I'm your darkest fear

But I'll never get caught you can't shake me shake me dear

I'm the invisible man

I'm the invisible man

Incredible how you can see right through me

Watch meI'm the invisible man

I'm the invisible man

It's criminal how I can see right through you

Look at me look at me

Shake you shake you shake you dear

Player Piano

Within this novel, Kurt Vonnegut utilizes irony as an important aspect of his story line. This irony plays a humorous role within the novel that allows the reader to enjoy the tale more thoroughly while portraying Vonnegut's point. With this said, the reader ends up concluding that while the machines enhance daily life by making it easier, they also took away from any point in living. No one was truly happy except for a select few that were honestly ignorant to what happiness ultimately is. An example of all of this irony that proves Vonnegut's point is on page 271 within the novel. On this first page of the chapter, one can see the ironic situation of the football coach. He is higher up in the hierarchy of the school than the Arts & Sciences teacher. This is clearly a commentary on today's society on how even today, people sometimes put sports in front of academics. The purpose of living is also brought up in this novel. Without realizing it, the more the characters create machines, the more a person's purpose in the world dissapears. Look at Bud from the novel. He created a machine that did his job better than him therefore leading him to be fired because of it. The thing that he loves to do has been taken away from him leaving with nothing to be passionate about. When this occurs, society loses a little piece of what could be a major part of the future. Humanity creating machines is the biggest betrayal in the novel. In the end, Vonnegut uses what he is most strong with in his writing to benefit his novel as a whole. Irony, is the tool that alludes to all things throughout the novel.


So as I am sitting here trying to figure out what I would rate this novel, I realize that I cannot remember whether or not I enjoyed the book. With this in mind, I would probably give this novel a six. Me not being able to remember whether I enjoyed reading it or not means that it was not that fantastic of a book. Yet, if I did not like this book at all, I would clearly still remember that too. This leaves me indifferent with a little bit more of a lean to liking the novel. It was very well written and it was a very easy read. I also liked how Vonnegut used irony as humor which made it more enjoyable. I really cannot think of anything in particular that I did not like about the novel.



pg 195-198: As for a quote, I chose a passage. I found the scene from the Meadows particulary humorous. Yet while being humorous, Vonnegut still managed to get what he was trying to portray across. He used many literary tools within this passage such as repetition and irony. The repetition of what the speaker was saying just showed that technology is preventing and interupting human interaction. The ironic part is what the speaker is actually saying. The speaker is telling the men to converse and make new aquaintances, but the speaker is constantly talking. With its boisterous voice, it is nearly impossible to hold a conversation none the less think straight. This passage also reminded me of Farenheit. In Farenheit, they would put shells in the ears of the people to stop them from having any thoughts. If any thinking went on, the shell would blast the ear with a sound that would create the person to not be able to think straight.

Handmaid's Tale

Within the novel, The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood, the many biblical allusions are very apparent. A few of them are the Rachel & Leah Centre, Gilead, Loaves & Fishes, and Milk and Honey. One could say that all of these biblical allusions are used for the sole purpose of furthering Atwood's satiric purpose in the novel. The Rachel & Leah enter represent the two sisters from the bible, Rachel and Leah who forced their handmaids/servants to sleep with their husband and to bear children. Ultimately it turned into a competition to fight for their husbands love. At the Rachel & Leah Centre in the novel, the women are taught to accept the idea that their duty to Gilead is provide a child for the family in which they reside with. They sleep with the Wife's husbands as part of the annual ritual. The name Gilead from the novel is a very barren, wasteland devastated by pollution and war. The society however tries to portray that the land is fertile and the best possible place to live in. Gilead from the Bible is a very fertile, desirable region in Ancient Palestine. Both Gilead's contradict themselves and create irony. The novel also replaces names like the bakery or butcher with Biblical names such as "Loaves & Fishes", "All Flesh", "Lilies of the Field", or "Milk and Honey". By renaming even food and clothes shops like this, the society manages to establish references to the Bible in every aspect of daily life. The new names are also meant to abandon old names for for shops that supposedly are "too much temptation" for the citizens. However, these names are highly ironic for they suggest abundance, while food in Gilead is in short supply.

"We were the people who were not in the papers. We lived in the blank white spaces at the edges of print. It gave us more freedom. We lived in the gaps between the stories" (57).

The quote above speaks about the Handmaid's of the novel. These women are viewed as in the way possessions by most. The handmaid's have barely and freedom. They are all the same leaving them emotionless and like a blank piece of paper. They live an invisible life for the most part being that their only sole purpose is to reproduce. The ironic part is that the Handmaid's view the only freedom they have being that they are invisible. The newspaper symbol is a representation of the society in which they reside in. The words are the higher rankings within while the Handmaid's, who basically equate to nothing, are the blank spaces on the edges-- waiting to be used only when necessary.

I enjoyed this novel thoroughly. I had read it last year as part of an English project and even then I found it amusing. For women to sit back and accept being degraded like this is baffling. I also enjoyed Margaret Atwood's use of satire. It helped portray her message. I enjoy novels that cause controversy and this was certainly one of them. It brought light upon certain topics that sometimes get ignored. It was not your typical book one reads for English class. I feel that all English classes should read this. It has more of a powerful message while not being boring at the same time.

Anthem

IOne major theme in the novel Anthem by Ayn Rand is the theme of individualism. In the society within this book, the individual is erased. The leaders go as far as to rule that everyone refers to themselves as "we." With this rule in place, the people are left without any sense of who they are. Everyone is the same, leaving no room for any individual thought. The people are left as shapeless beings with the fear that if they do have any different perspectives from the rest of society, they will be rejected. However, there is a flaw in this system. Human nature allows a person to never be dominated. The inner feelings and thoughts being suppressed will always ultimately resurface due to the fact that freedom is a part of everyone. This is what happened with the main character Equality 7-2521. Equality, having his invention rejected, runs away to the forest where he begins living with his companion. The message of the individual always rising to the top is what Rand uses as a theme to better portray her novel.

I AM. I THINK. I WILL. My hands... My spirit... My sky... My forest... This earth is mine...

I am a man. This miracle of me is mine to own and keep, and mine to guard, and mine to use, and mine to kneel before! ... For the word "we" must never be spoken, save by one's choice or as a second thought. This word must never be placed first within mand's soul, else it becomes a monster, the root of all evils on earth, the root of man's torture by men, and of an unspeakable lie. The word "we" is as a lime poured over men, which sets and hardens to stone, and crushes all beneath it, and that which is white adn that which is black are lost equally in the grey of it... and now I see this face of god, and I raise this god over the earth, this god whom men have sought since men came into being, this god who will grant them joy and peace and pride. This god, this one word:

"I" (97)

I chose this partial passage because I loved how powerful Eqaulity spoke here. His full liberation is so fascinating to read through. It is hard to imagine losing the word "I" in one's vocabulary. It also makes the reader realize how powerful such a word is. Just by reading what Equality is saying can see how much respect he holds for the word. He pretty much compares it to a god. In the end, I could not fit the complete passage for it is three pages long, but this short excerpt speaks volumes in itself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzlcJMzay6M

I found the above video. I think as a school project, the makers were asked to create a trailer for the book. Check it out.

I enjoyed this novel. It was a fast, easy read. I enjoyed the message that Rand was portraying, and I also enjoyed her style of writing. The other factor that made me like this novel better was the fact that I did not like We. The novel also had many good quotes in it as well.

Thought I'd spice things up a bit going along with the K-Fed theme...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0rq8nRQW_o

Acrobat

In The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood, a society exists where woman are treated with respect but lack all freedom. Through devices like syntax, detail, and point of view (just to name a few), the song "Acrobat" by U2 shows a clear connection to lifestyle that is led by the women in the society within the story.

The lyrics in the song describe a stuggle between a woman in choosing whether to fight for her rights or to sit back and just take watch them get taken away. The song describes a girl that used to have a firery spirit. She appears to be the type of person that never let anyone tell her what to do. However something drastic happens that brings her down to the level of almost being a ghost, "...you had fire in your soul/ what happened to your face/ of melting in snow/ now it looks like this..." The girl has the inner struggle of wanting to break free but something is holding her back whether it be fear or something else. The same story line takes place within The Handmaid's Tale. Offred, the main character, goes along with what the society preaches. She never disobeys or rebels. However, it appears that internally she struggles. Memories and emotions of the past cause her to reminisce to what she considers better times. She secretly desires everything to return back to the way it used to be. But instead of thinking of ways to make a change, she instead blocks out everything with the thought of how silly the idea is. She also demonstrates this inner desire to get out by reflecting on Moira, her high spirited friend. Moira is someone Offred wishes she could be. (bastard-syntax)

Another thing that is simiar is the way men are portrayed in each. Through the repitition of the line "so don't let the bastards grind you down," one gets the sense that men are the ones forcing the girl to endure the struggle she is going through. Likewise in the story. Offred's society is one run solely by males. All of which who have established the lack of freedom for the woman.

In the end, both the song "Acrobat" and the novel The Handmaid's Tale portray an internal struggle where the women are left to make a difficult decision: sit back and watch the freedoms taken or do something to make a change for the better.

We

An interesting thing withWe is the many breaks within each record. It is rarely ever seen in novels and some people could argue that it hurts the novel when people are left to make up their own sentences. However, with We, the breaks within the pages of the story actually have a deeper meaning then simply incompleted sentences. The breaks ultimatly symbolize D-503's conflict with his want to fullfill his personal desires vs. his loyalty to OneState. The breaks are seen only when D-503 has thoughts that are considered going against what OneState preaches. These thoughts are D-503's desires. He shows emotions for I-330 which is bad. He is considered to have a soul which is bad. And he considers rebelling against certain rules which is bad. The breaks benefit the story by allowing the reader to finish D-503's thoughts. For the most part everyone is able to see where D-503 is going with the sentence and come up with similar completed sentences (as seen in a demonstration during class one day). In the end, the breaks would appear to hurt the novel but in reality they help portray the struggle that D-503 appears to exhibit.

"What's going on? A soul? Did you say, a soul? What the hell! Next thing you know we'll have cholera again" (88).

I chose this quote because I found it very humorous. I think it is funny that the leaders of OneState compare having a soul to having cholera which is a deadly disease. They pretty much make it sound that if one were to have a soul one is doomed to die. In reality, a soul is what makes up each and every person. It is what makes them their own individual. OneState cleary is trying to rid its society of individualism by convincing its people that having a soul is considered bad. Not only that, but they threaten the idea of being an outcast with it. And like any human being noone wants to be considered an outcast in a society.

I thought that the novel We was ok. I enjoyed anthem a lot better out of the two but this was bareable. I think the reason as to why I did not like the book as much might be because it was very confusing to read. The story also required the reader to think more outside the box then usual when forced to complete D-503's sentences. Overall, I did not hate the novel, but I simply just did not enjoy reading it. However, I might have enjoyed it more if I did not have Anthem to compare it to.

Farenheit 451

A major symbol of the story was hands. Hands represented both good and evil. The evil aspect was when the hands were used to burn the books. The books were the only representation of free thinking that still existed. And by burning them, individual ideas also burned out. The good aspect of the hands is that they also created things. At one point in the story, one of the men talks about his father being a sculpture and creating beatiful things and using his hands to the best of his ability. Hands also fall in the middle when it comes to killing and reading. The firemen sometimes ended up killing innocent people who were different in the society but at the same time, hands saved Montage when he killed Beatty. In this society, it is also bad to read or even pick up a book, but reading saved Montage life by making him realize the wrongs of the world he lives in. In the end, hands appear to have a mind/character of their own and end up being an extension of the owner-- feeding off the mind.I personally did not like the novel. I felt Montage's character was more of a coward and not a hero and that bothered me. Instead of Montage following his own thoughts, he listened to what others told him to do. And when their advice turned him into a criminal, he just ran away. He never once stood up for what he believed in. If Montage had been more of a leader then a follower, maybe I would have liked the novel better. The only good thing that came out of him being a coward was that he became more self aware. However this still did not persuade my opinion of the book.
I found this clip off youtube and it is a music video showing scene from the movie version of this book. I found it interesting that the way the movie portrayed the novel has a totally different perspective of what everything looked like from my own perspective. I pictured it more of a town that was always really in darkness and everything was super hightech or super fast. The house in the clip was very like todays modern houses and the firetruck did not impress me in any way shape or form. The only thing that matched with how I actually pictured it, is the scene where the firemen went inside the house to burn the books in it. The inside is the same way I pictured along with the way the events occured. If you listen to the lyrics, you'll see that they go along with the symbol of hands as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zilil5W7xxU

I'll comment of other people's posts when I figure out how.